It
An “it” can be anything tangible and measurable. An “it” you might point to, or you could refer to “it” as a version of shared concept – one that’s been introduced or one that will be soon. “It” can be a concept that’s been or will be articulated.

“It” can be a being of neutral gender, a place, or inanimate object. For a full list check the Oxford dictionary.

I’m considering “it” for a new name. Unlike Prince, no symbol for me! What’s the point in keeping my name E-I-E-I -O-U-Y-A WIth it’s space defining consonants? I’m told as a post-menopausal “retiree”, by men and women half my age, I’m no more than an “it” wasting skin and resources. Or so the media would lead me to believe with “its” incessant harping on how I must improve to have worth.

When “it” is tangible, there’s a being stamped in and of time. Those “its” are created from water saturated dust called “clay”. All items of time, eventually become dust again.
*
The word “It” starts with an “I’”, so “it” is Yod with Vav/Vau in rapt alignment.

So with “it”, G-d’s hand and fingers form “it’s” substance. Fingers create worlds by their craft and sign reading. Fingers represent the powers of intelligence (applied “intel”) (Mercury), will (Mars), love and beauty (Venus), and expansion (Jupiter).

Saturn is in the thumb, along with the sun. Together our hands do everything for us. The whole construct of hand represents our moon which is our sun in this lifetime’s version of illumination and visibility.
*

“It” ends with ‘T’ for Teth G-d’s lust and Tav/Tau – manifest density of entity.

Yod’s hand has a wrist (could also be thought of as ‘wry-est’- our dry structure without emotional connection), “it’s” digits are extensions of Kaph’s palm. So an “it” depends on opportunity and is the action of hand as it performs “its” finite task.

“It” is a reflection of its name, as seen by the creator’s eye.

A tangible “it” is created by an action – usually by hu(e)-man or nature.
“It” may be a noun but was first an idea.
“It” expresses what “it’s” creator G-d wants with “it”.
The energy of “it” depends on its creator as well as how “it” is used.

With that Yod and Vau are a composite entity embuing Saturn’s density and all that’s tangible.

Nouns as subject to time’s passages and ravages eventually dissipate. Whereas vowels are eternal – until they are absorbed. Vowels are through which “its” spirit lives on.
*
There’s a baby “it” that’s just peeping it’s head. An idea of being just born and not applied into action. “It” is learning and absorbing from everything. As “it” absorbs, “it” grows. This can be nutrient or thoughts. Then “it” levels out, takes “its” time to assimilate.

(Some foods and thoughts cause ‘shrinkage’- like food that is bad causes emesis and diarrhea or even wasting disease, and thoughts can be crippling from the intention of words expressed then “it” is stuck or regresses.)

An this stage,“It” isn’t ‘producing’, nor should “it”- “it’s” too green and may be bitter.

(Should=’she would if she could’- in this case no, “it” is not ready.)
*
There’s “it” growing up. “It” has reared “it’s” head out of humbling morass and the field of potential. “It” has become attracted to a thing outside of self -the sun for example. Then “its” field is synchronized and from Mem’s pure earth potential, shaped into letters with meaning and activity.

Then “It’s” earliest blooms are noticed. “It” develops a set of call and response (a language) that are adequate to serve in accord with whatever G-d[ G-d = the field of pure aligned potential and sum of all possibilities in the entire universe to serve the highest and greatest good for all beings down to their tiptoes. G-d is our Higher Power. He goes by many names – including ones like “She” and “Her”. But since G-d is hu(e)-man’s reflection, G-d is not an “it”. No “its” should be worshipped.] wishes. Usually ideas rooted in needs and necessity – instead of vibrations of growth and expansion, at least until now.

With “it”, we glom onto possibility to further form us.

As “it” serves in “its” immediate life, many stay unchanged – with little hopes for renewal, refurbishment, recycling, or reiteration when “it” is worn out from “its” primary purpose; its sustained in an original, if not deteriorating form. An “it” sticks to “its” prescription.

Once “it” leaves G-d’s original collective, “it” uses it’s gifts and becomes a specialized variant according to “its” new milieu. Then, in time, when necessity drives it or curiosity, other uses are thought of.

“It” sheds confusion as it clarifies- yet “its” essence remains.

Slowly or quickly, at last, “it” deteriorates.

As “it” breaks apart bit by bit; breakdown always starts with “its” weakest link – from there loss of integrity depends on structures and bonds, heat and enzyme catalysts.

When “it” passes on, it becomes discarnate. “It” will eventually be cleared of itself and it’s spirit may fly away to above and below – or transfer laterally. When “it” transitions, “it” breaks down “its” building blocks and consonants.

Then for “it”, there’s it’s remembrance by those left. This is often the hardest part-when “its” left, there’s a void, a wanting, and an essence of ‘why’ “its” useful.

Then “it’s” life force, isn’t. “It” shifts to become mythology and someone’s history.
Transferring “its” energy as it does, to all the little critters in “its” path who then carry an engram of “it” in their soma’s corpus.

An “its” heart may be eclipsed by greater forces than “it” such that “it’s” not seen amongst “it’s” world of beings or in “its” lifetime- but “its” there nonetheless as an idea carried.

An “it” is not a he or a she; “it” has no sex drive. Or if it has gender polarization, “it’s” disregarded – like until recently, a girl in China or those publicly effaced with niquab and still many others. (This makes me very sad!!!)

“It” neither attracts or repulses an opposite. An “it” can align or misalign though. Although, since all that is tangible and observable is a form of spirit’s vessel, by default, the tangible “it” is a ‘she’.

*

While with an “it”, a being doesn’t transform, shift or change – without something external acting on it. An “it” has no consciousness. An “it” is a ‘tool’. It does or describes part of a larger picture.

Then it might break down or need maintenance- like a toaster might get a crotchety button but it will make toast until an element burns out – wherein the ‘king’ – that which puts the toaster to work, either replaces the element, or the toaster.

A not-it, as a conscious being, will transform and shift. Hu(e)-mans can do and be anybody they want to be in reality – with care and dedication.

*

A square peg is a square peg – it will work best in a square hole. If you want to force a square peg into a round hole, the square peg will only fit inside a larger hole and vice versa. You can force it into a smaller hold – by breaking and wearing down it’s edges. It’s four edges will have contact with the interior of the round hole -leaving vacancy as it stretches to contact. Someedges won’t connect at all.

A round peg will inscribe a larger square- and touch where it’s tangential.

But for both placed in other’s ‘position’ – there’s unused space left over- like a version of unused potential. To have the same ‘stability’ as a round peg in a round hole and square peg in a square hold, you need ‘filler’, third party’s attention and special attribute.

Not-it, has the additional letters of ‘not’ and a hyphen. So that can be anything but – a hu(e)-man is not an “it”.

So in addition to embodying the hand of G-d, incarnate from being ‘wished’ for (Teth) and ‘incarnate into Saturn’s density’, it has “Not” too.

“Not” is Nun, with Teth, Samech and Vau and Teth and Tav again. So while an “it” is the creation of Yod and Vau, it may or may not be heart’s desirable entity (Nun) brining unity to one’s obedient and rapt corpus (Samech, unity, is derived with mercy (as one must forgive and be forgiven as hu(e)-man imperfect vessels) as well as want.

The hyphen adds a vowel of your choice A-E-I-O-U; this gives it ~infinite power when activated.